<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Source Analysis Still Needs Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coderjournal-backend/index.php/2008/05/microsoft-soruce-analysis-still-needs-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coderjournal.com/2008/05/microsoft-soruce-analysis-still-needs-work/</link>
	<description>while(!(succeed = try()));</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.coderjournal.com/2008/05/microsoft-soruce-analysis-still-needs-work/#comment-6391</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 05:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coderjournal.com/?p=231#comment-6391</guid>
		<description>Developers are not supposed to agree on style. Otherwise they couldn't argue about it. I agree with your post, thanks. I removed style cop because it had some compatibility problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Developers are not supposed to agree on style. Otherwise they couldn&#8217;t argue about it. I agree with your post, thanks. I removed style cop because it had some compatibility problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Berardi</title>
		<link>http://www.coderjournal.com/2008/05/microsoft-soruce-analysis-still-needs-work/#comment-6387</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Berardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 03:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coderjournal.com/?p=231#comment-6387</guid>
		<description>I make it a habit to not update posts, even if I come off looking like a dork.  Unless I have insulted somebody and I need to apologize, that is the only time I update a post.  Plus it's nice to have a record of your ignorance, something to look back on, like some of your first code, or mistakes you made when you were younger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I make it a habit to not update posts, even if I come off looking like a dork.  Unless I have insulted somebody and I need to apologize, that is the only time I update a post.  Plus it&#8217;s nice to have a record of your ignorance, something to look back on, like some of your first code, or mistakes you made when you were younger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugenez</title>
		<link>http://www.coderjournal.com/2008/05/microsoft-soruce-analysis-still-needs-work/#comment-6370</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugenez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 21:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coderjournal.com/?p=231#comment-6370</guid>
		<description>Nick,

If I were you I'd update the original post, since it is hugely misleading. It is clear that with customized settings the tool would be worthless, but it does have settings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>If I were you I&#8217;d update the original post, since it is hugely misleading. It is clear that with customized settings the tool would be worthless, but it does have settings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Berardi</title>
		<link>http://www.coderjournal.com/2008/05/microsoft-soruce-analysis-still-needs-work/#comment-6355</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Berardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 15:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coderjournal.com/?p=231#comment-6355</guid>
		<description>Okay well that makes total sense now.  There is a settings for source analysis.  However to my defense  Visual Studio has taught me to do two things.  Look under project settings, it wasn't there, look under visual studio settings, it wasn't there.  I have never seen a project put its settings under the context menu, so it didn't even occur to look there.  IMO this project is about normalizing user habit and following it.  The user in the case of this program is a programmer.  However this program doesn't even follow normalized user habits that Visual Studio has standardized.  I don't blame them, but I think they should drink a little of their own Kool-Aid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay well that makes total sense now.  There is a settings for source analysis.  However to my defense  Visual Studio has taught me to do two things.  Look under project settings, it wasn&#8217;t there, look under visual studio settings, it wasn&#8217;t there.  I have never seen a project put its settings under the context menu, so it didn&#8217;t even occur to look there.  IMO this project is about normalizing user habit and following it.  The user in the case of this program is a programmer.  However this program doesn&#8217;t even follow normalized user habits that Visual Studio has standardized.  I don&#8217;t blame them, but I think they should drink a little of their own Kool-Aid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Skaue</title>
		<link>http://www.coderjournal.com/2008/05/microsoft-soruce-analysis-still-needs-work/#comment-6295</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Skaue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 10:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coderjournal.com/?p=231#comment-6295</guid>
		<description>Guess what I did turn off immidiately after the first scan... ;-)
      
        
          
            False
          
        
      

I so agree with you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess what I did turn off immidiately after the first scan&#8230; <img src='http://www.coderjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>            False</p>
<p>I so agree with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hatchan</title>
		<link>http://www.coderjournal.com/2008/05/microsoft-soruce-analysis-still-needs-work/#comment-6294</link>
		<dc:creator>hatchan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 10:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coderjournal.com/?p=231#comment-6294</guid>
		<description>Hi, its possible turn off some rules by right clicking a project and then 'Source Analyse Settings'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, its possible turn off some rules by right clicking a project and then &#8216;Source Analyse Settings&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.coderjournal.com/2008/05/microsoft-soruce-analysis-still-needs-work/#comment-6278</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 03:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coderjournal.com/?p=231#comment-6278</guid>
		<description>I'm 100% positive there's a configuration, you just didn't look hard enough!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m 100% positive there&#8217;s a configuration, you just didn&#8217;t look hard enough!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DotNetKicks.com</title>
		<link>http://www.coderjournal.com/2008/05/microsoft-soruce-analysis-still-needs-work/#comment-6274</link>
		<dc:creator>DotNetKicks.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 01:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coderjournal.com/?p=231#comment-6274</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft Source Analysis Still Needs Work...&lt;/strong&gt;

You've been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from DotNetKicks.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Microsoft Source Analysis Still Needs Work&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>You&#8217;ve been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from DotNetKicks.com&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
