http://www.coderjournal.com/2007/06/less-rules-imposed-the-better/ while(!(succeed = try())); Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:29:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://www.coderjournal.com/2007/06/less-rules-imposed-the-better/comment-page-1/#comment-435 Nick Berardi Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:06:53 +0000 http://www.coderjournal.com/2007/06/less-rules-imposed-the-better/#comment-435 No Pi won't change, but if I just start multiplying things by 3.14 all over my code that could be PI or it could be the weight of my hamster, either could be true. Plus some engineer in .NET went out of his way to generate properties like String.Empty, Environment.NewLine, Math.Pi, etc, so the least I can do is use them. No Pi won’t change, but if I just start multiplying things by 3.14 all over my code that could be PI or it could be the weight of my hamster, either could be true. Plus some engineer in .NET went out of his way to generate properties like String.Empty, Environment.NewLine, Math.Pi, etc, so the least I can do is use them.

]]> http://www.coderjournal.com/2007/06/less-rules-imposed-the-better/comment-page-1/#comment-434 serge Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:03:57 +0000 http://www.coderjournal.com/2007/06/less-rules-imposed-the-better/#comment-434 Funny idea. Neither thought using Integer.ZERO instead of 0 on the principle that it may be more general. For PI, well, you just cannot write it down with a finite set of digits, so it make more sense however for a completly different reason - anyway I don't think PI definition will change soon! Funny idea. Neither thought using Integer.ZERO instead of 0 on the principle that it may be more general. For PI, well, you just cannot write it down with a finite set of digits, so it make more sense however for a completly different reason - anyway I don’t think PI definition will change soon!

]]>